The Ground Game: How Black PACs and Grassroots Networks Fought for the Vote in 2026
Election nights belong to candidates. Election years belong to organizers. Long before the first precinct reported on November 3, 2026, a dense and often invisible infrastructure of Black-led political action committees and grassroots networks had spent months — in some cases years — registering voters, knocking doors, running text and phone banks, and moving people to the polls in the states that would decide control of Congress and a dozen governorships.
This is the story of that ground game: who built it, how it works, and what this cycle revealed about the state of Black political power.
The National Heavyweights
BlackPAC, founded in 2016, is the most explicitly electoral of the national groups. An independent, Black-led organization, it engages voters year-round — at their doors, in their neighborhoods, online, and by mail — with the stated goal of driving structural change across economic, justice, and political systems. Its battleground map has been consistent: Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Arizona. The through-line of its model is continuity — treating mobilization as a permanent operation rather than a parachute that opens every four years.
Color Of Change PAC, the electoral arm of the nation's largest online racial justice organization, runs its Voting While Black initiative out of urban hubs in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and North Carolina. Its niche is digital infrastructure married to local organizing: elevating progressive candidates who share community values, and — just as centrally — holding elected leaders accountable after the votes are counted.
Black Men Vote PAC occupies a lane no other national group claims: the specific work of registering, organizing, and turning out Black men. Its proof of concept was Georgia in 2020 and the Senate runoffs that followed, where record Black male turnout helped flip the state. The group's premise is that Black men are not a persuasion problem to be managed but a constituency to be organized — and that the difference shows up in the margin.
The Movement Builders
If the PACs are the electoral artillery, Black Voters Matter Fund is the supply line. Structured as a movement-building fund rather than a federal PAC, it has invested more than $50 million across 25-plus states, much of it granted to local, often Black-women-led organizations that national campaigns overlook. Its bus tours and "parties at the polls" along the Southern battleground corridor are the visible edge of a deeper strategy: building civic infrastructure that survives any single election.
The Texas Organizing Project shows what that looks like at state scale. Founded in 2009 and rooted in the Black and Latino communities of Harris, Dallas, and Bexar counties, TOP runs what it describes as the largest independent get-out-the-vote field program in Texas — year-round, issue-based, and aimed at expanding the electorate of color in a state whose political future runs through its cities.
Built Between Elections
The groups above are only the visible edge of a deeper system. Mainstream campaigns too often treat Black communities on a "firefighter" model: money and attention arrive in October and vanish the morning after. The alternative is older and slower, rooted in the tradition Ella Baker championed and the Highlander Folk School practiced: strong people, not strong leaders, trained year-round in their own communities.
That infrastructure rests on three pillars. Movement schools and popular education (Highlander, BOLD, the Ella Baker Center, BYP100) build political literacy and organizer leadership. Candidate and leadership pipelines (Higher Heights for America, Collective PAC, the Movement for Black Lives' Electoral Justice Project) train the campaign managers and candidates who let communities own their electoral operations rather than lease them. Research and policy institutions (the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies, the LDF Thurgood Marshall Institute, the African American Policy Forum) supply the data and legal defense that hold officials accountable after the votes are counted.
The hardest test comes in the off-years, when donors leave and funding dries up. Whether these institutions survive between cycles decides whether the next election starts from zero or from strength.
Why the Infrastructure Matters
The 2026 cycle tested a proposition these groups have advanced for a decade: that sustained, community-rooted organizing outperforms last-minute advertising. The stakes were concrete. In Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed's Senate campaign depended on Detroit-area turnout of exactly the kind BlackPAC and Color Of Change exist to produce. In Georgia and North Carolina, Black women candidates for governor and Senate ran on terrain Black Voters Matter has been cultivating for years. In Texas, TOP's field program pressed the long project of making the state's electorate look like its population.
The proposition held. In Michigan, more than 4.8 million people voted, an apparent midterm record, and El-Sayed won 2,507,906 votes to Mike Rogers's 2,173,595, 52.5 percent to 45.5 percent. Wayne County supplied the margin: 506,145 votes to 194,754 with 757 of 770 precincts reporting, more than 92 percent in Detroit. In Georgia, Keisha Lance Bottoms won 2,268,464 votes to 1,908,266, carrying Fulton (334,235, 73.8 percent), DeKalb (271,921, 84.8 percent) and Clayton (85,913, 89.6 percent). In Texas, where the Texas Organizing Project runs its field program, Gina Hinojosa defeated Gov. Greg Abbott 5,230,929 votes to 4,524,955 (52.8 percent to 45.7 percent), and James Talarico beat Ken Paxton for the Senate 5,445,156 to 4,249,763 (55 to 43 percent). Exit polls showed about 90 percent of Black voters backing both, and LULAC counted about 1.6 million Latino ballots, nearly double 2022. In Nevada, Aaron Ford became the first Black governor elected west of the Mississippi, defeating Gov. Joe Lombardo 530,510 to 455,302 (51.5 to 44.2 percent), carried by the Culinary Union's door-knocking machine. In South Carolina, Annie Andrews unseated Sen. Lindsey Graham, while Black Democratic candidates for every constitutional office drew roughly 914,000 to 967,000 votes each, 47 to 48 percent of the total, a floor of about 950,000 built by Christale Spain's state party. The State Election Commission reported a record gubernatorial-year turnout, with 1,927,488 ballots counted by 6 p.m. on Election Day; final Senate totals await certification. In Wisconsin, Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley won the open governor's seat, becoming the state's first Black governor on the strength of Milwaukee's Black and Latino wards. Four Black Democrats won governorships, Wes Moore in Maryland, Bottoms in Georgia, Ford in Nevada and Crowley in Wisconsin, and Democrats retook the Senate.
Voter protection was the quiet half of the operation. Black Voters Matter put more than 2,000 observers in polling places and reported no widescale problems. The 866-OUR-VOTE hotline logged more than 38,000 calls across the cycle, with Texas, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New York generating the most on Election Day.
Winning Against the Map
Slate’s Madiba K. Dennie argues that Black voters standing up to the Supreme Court and threats to their representation helped drive the Democratic wave. Her analysis places Louisiana v. Callais and efforts to weaken Black electoral power at the center of the story. For this series, the distinction matters: winning under hostile district lines does not make those lines fair. The work of organizing is not evidence that voting-rights protections are unnecessary; it is a reason to defend them. The results alone cannot tell us how much any single ruling changed turnout, but they demand that communities’ sustained work remain central to the account.
In an interview with John Nichols of The Nation, former Vice President Kamala Harris conceded the point organizers have pressed for years: writing off the South becomes a "self-fulfilling prophecy," because a party that will not invest in a region guarantees it will lose there. The organizers in this story did not wait for that lesson to reach Washington. They built the infrastructure first, and national attention followed the results.
What to Watch in the Numbers
Michigan's turnout topped the 4.5 million who voted in 2022. The Legal Defense Fund reported Black turnout above previous midterm levels, strongest in states that redrew congressional maps after Louisiana v. Callais. In Georgia, county Black population share and Bottoms's vote share correlated at 0.83; she carried 29 of the 43 counties that are at least 40 percent Black. Black women again anchored the coalition at 93 percent. Black men gave about 86 percent, short of Obama's 95 percent in 2008. That gap is why Black Men Vote exists. Certified county turnout by race will not be available for weeks. We will add the 2018 and 2022 comparisons when it is.
The headline results will fade. The infrastructure will not. However Tuesday broke, the organizations profiled here will be back at the doors within weeks — because their wager is that power is built between elections, not on them.
The HistorianSpeaks dispatch
Track Black politics past and present. One dispatch a week, free.
Ask the Historian
Have a question about this story, or an idea for a future post? Send it here.